Pass it on…

The Rising Costs of Real Estate Taxes By Suzanne Andresen I attended the launch of the Atlanta Chapter of the National Rental Home Council a few months ago and heard a lot about the SFR arena and the current concerns facing the industry. There were a few discussion points that I felt were more pressing than others. Certainly, the concerns about trespass were front and center, as Atlanta seems to have become one of the industry’s hot beds for that activity. Other areas of focus were the escalating insurance fees affecting certain markets, following the many catastrophic weather events we have seen across the country. If you would like to learn more about that topic, consider attending the AmeriCatalyst event in Washington, DC April 18th and 19th — Going to Extremes. The Rise in Real Estate Taxes The topic that I was most interested in was centered around real estate taxes. It seems that every year these fees continue to rise. In theory, that should not be the case. I am an elected official in Maine, and we recently completed the 10-year state required revaluation process for real estate and personal property. We were a few years behind due to COVID and needed all of the 18 months allocated to this task. We followed the state valuation process, hired an appraisal firm, and visited each and every real estate asset in the town. The state mandates that the town can assess a maximum of 5% overlay for items not currently projected as budgetary items. We have specific guidelines in this process where the town is prohibited from overcharging taxes to the residents and remaining within the limitation of the 5% rate as our overlap buffer. Once we receive the completed analysis with updated determination of current asset valuations, the elected officials then review what the town expects to spend annually to meet the town demand of services provided. As I am sure that all town budgets allocate the highest percentage to the school budget, the remainder of the monies in our town budget are reserved for the other municipal elements necessary to keep the town running like road repairs, first responders, public library, etc. In theory, as the values rise, the mill rate used to determine the tax bill falls. In the end, your real estate tax bills should remain relatively fixed unless you have altered your property for improvement. The new valuation the town received projected our tax rate to a significantly higher value from the previous assessments, — nearly 60%. Some of the increased value was the 15-year timeframe from the last revaluation. Additional increased value stemmed from an anomaly yet to have been experienced in the past following the frenzied acquisition appetite and fall out of COVID relocation — work from home scenarios. As a licensed real estate designated broker, I was surprised that this atmosphere trickled into Maine and was sustainable for more than two years. We are not mainstream America by any means. COVID Relocation Practices In watching real estate transactions, I learned that local residential mortgage requirements actually added in new COVID relocation practices, requesting remote employees purchasing homes in a new location to receive written approval from their employer, confirming that the employee’s job was indeed an approved offsite employment contract. We have seen companies require employees to return to the brick-and-mortar office buildings for onsite duties. Some have adopted a varied schedule or went completely to a 5-day work week in the office. The fear for the mortgage holder was that once the employer realized the employee had moved, perhaps their job would be in jeopardy for this new relocation destination when the return to the office policy would be reinstated, creating an uptick in foreclosed properties. Let’s look at the effects relocation has had on rental real estate. My brother recently moved from New York to South Carolina. He is recently divorced and decided to put his assets in a trust for his children. When he purchased his house, the taxes were estimated at $8,300 annually. After the closing documents and deed were recorded, the county billed the taxes for the new year at $25,830 under the assumption this was now a rental property due to the trust name on the deed. What factors from the county contribute to over a 300%+ markup on real estate taxes? It is not like rental properties have added families with nine school aged children and feel it is justified in this tax allocation. If we review the 5% overlay state limitation in tax allocations in Maine, this would not be an allowable assessment. There is an ever-increasing need for housing and rental properties, which will make it nearly impossible to forecast the demand. Municipalities should not be able to have fluctuating tax rates as part of the real estate property town revenues. We would not be able to meet the overlay stipulation with this assessment practice. As a landlord, rental fees include the monthly real estate tax as a pass through to the tenant, in all markets. Ultimately, the state’s assessment practices are the cause for rental properties becoming out of reach for certain tenants. The investors are constantly held accountable for gobbling up the available assets across the country, in front of first-time home buyers. There is a significant, purposeful rental engagement with many younger tenants. They are attracted to the flexibility of living wherever and whenever they want. Additionally, the population transitioning to the retirement aged scenarios have also decided they prefer renting vs owning. They have moved closer to their grandchildren and want the flexibility to pursue different locations and lifestyles, on a more flexible basis. We need to stop the perpetual demonization of real estate investors. They are providing valuable housing services to towns and communities across the country.

Read More

National Private Lender Association Conference

March 7-9, 2024 // Miami, Florida The Largest NonBank Lending Conference

Read More

Economic Outlook for Multifamily Investment Opportunities

Long-Term Success is Still Extremely Viable By Nate Zielinski Over the past two years, the U.S. economy has been like a simmering pot of water that has yet to reach its boiling point. There was a spike in interest rates across the country and inflation began to creep in and be noticeable in daily life for Americans everywhere. A lot of different facets of the economy were affected and real estate investing was no different. Rising interest rates had a domino effect that led to affordability issues for homebuyers and tenants  and even a lack of inventory for investors. However, the market has stabilized, and consumers and investors are now adjusting to the current market and looking to achieve even more success. One of the strategies that is getting the most buzz heading into 2024 and beyond is multifamily property investments. There are mixed signals in the multifamily space currently, but it is always a path to success in the investment industry. Record Setting Supply vs. Diminishing Demand According to RealPage.com, there will be over 1 million new apartment units built throughout the course of 2023 and 2024, the highest level of supply in the U.S. since 1987. Undoubtedly, when these projects began construction, there was the thought that the economy would be a little more stable than it is right now, and this supply would be met with the appropriate demand. The main factor is going to be where the progression of millennials is in regard to owning property. A lot of millennials are moving out of apartments and into single family homes. Whether they are buying or renting, there is the desire to have their own space and privacy, and the apartment life is not as appealing. Also, the next generation, known as Gen Z, is not quite ready to rent as most are still in high school or college. This middle ground between the generations has created a blind spot for apartments, but this will not last forever. There is some speculation from investors due to this supply and demand narrative, but multifamily investing is one of the best ways to exponentially expand wealth. Due to the supply right now, the rental incomes have stalled, so the return-on-investment questions have been raised by investors when deciding to invest in multifamily properties In an article published on FastCompany.com, Lance Lambert states, “This influx has given renters a plethora of options and significantly decelerated rent growth, with outright apartment rent declines in many markets.” Reasons for Optimism While the above statement is true, it needs to be reiterated that with the Gen Z renters coming into the fold in the next few years this issue will not last. Although rents cannot be as high right now due to supply, this can also lead to easily filling every unit for investors due to rent being affordable in these larger apartment style buildings. When demand catches up to supply, investors can begin to charge more for rent year over year, and they can do this with a completely occupied apartment building due to these properties filling up when rents were low. There is obviously some patience that needs to be applied but the payoff is attainable. Also, as stated above, the construction of these multifamily units has hit a 40-year high. Some of the markets seeing the biggest rise in multifamily units include cities such as Nashville and Austin. These two markets have seen a massive spike in population over the past few years and these people are looking for affordable housing options. With rental rates stalling due to the supply, securing a multifamily property in these markets is a huge win for investors. These two cities are expensive to live in, so the potential of increasing rent will be there for investors to cash in on down the line. There is also a bit of a negative connotation for multifamily investment properties right now so the competition in these typically competitive markets may be at the lowest it has been in a long time. Other southern markets that continue to grow include Houston, San Antonio, Dallas and Knoxville, Tennessee. In an excerpt from Forbes magazine, there were some positive signs late in 2023 that displays pushback from the overarching narrative that rent growths are stalling. “Rent growth ticked positive in October 2023, according to Zillow, after falling monthly for more than a year. The slight increase could be seasonal, aberrational or a hint that rent growth might be trending upward. I envision rent growth moderating based on several factors,” writes Michael Zaransky. There is also the elephant that has not left the room yet when it comes to the rise in interest rates that have taken place over the past few years. A lot of potential home buyers have strayed away from purchasing a home as they wait for a decrease in interest rates. Although the preference is a single-family rental for most of this demographic, apartments are also an appealing option because they can typically be cheaper and allow the tenant to save more money before buying a home. There is no denying that most, if not all, would prefer the SFR living arrangement, but it is not always what they can get or afford. The multifamily rental space will still have a sizable presence in the years to come. Final Thoughts for 2024 Of course, there are pros and cons to all investment strategies. There are positive outlooks and negative ones. The multifamily investment strategy in 2024 is no different. There are certainly opportunities across the country where investors can inject themselves into bigger markets and start securing some of these properties. The payoff may not be immediate, but securing these properties to ensure long-term success is still extremely viable and many are forecasting in the next few years that apartments and multifamily properties will be highly sought after by investors and renters alike. Getting ahead of the curve and securing these properties can be a massive

Read More

How to Become Successful Real Estate Entrepreneurs?

Always Do What You Say You Are Going to Do and Do it With Integrity Tim and Melissa Swartz are independent business owners with HomeVestors® of America, Inc. in the Columbus, Ohio, market, and Melissa is currently serving as the Ad Council President for that area. The couple started their HomeVestors business, HumbleBee Properties, LLC in 2017 after each having successful careers in business and education administration. Their driving factor is their family—to have the ability fully enjoy and support their three children through their formative years. Life Before HomeVestors After graduating from Ashland University in 2007 with a degree in political science and government, Tim became a commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps serving as an attack helicopter pilot and operational planner. He left the Corps in 2016 and attended The Ohio State University where he earned his MBA. Upon graduation, he first worked for JP Morgan Chase and later transitioned to help grow a small insurance technology company called PolicyFuel. It was during his tenure at JP Morgan Chase that they bought the HomeVestors franchise. Melissa met Tim while both were attending Ashland University. After graduation, she attended the University of West Florida where she earned her master’s degree in higher education and administration. For 13 years, Melissa worked in universities focusing on compliance, specifically with issues related to student conduct and sexual assault. It is in this trying environment where she developed her passion for helping people. Becoming a HomeVestors Independent Business Owner “We bought our HomeVestors franchise because we both had an entrepreneurial spirit and we also saw the business as a way of helping others,” Melissa explained. “In fact, the very first question we ask a prospective seller is, ‘What can we do to help?’ Much of the time we don’t buy their house, but we find some other way to get them through whatever difficult situation they may be in. Though most instances do not end in a financial reward, the intangible benefit of doing right by people is what makes us truly proud of what we do.” True to their backgrounds in compliance and military planning, from day one they fully embraced the proven HVA process and focused on execution and operational flexibility. “In our first year, we concentrated on wholesaling and a few quick flips to establish a good cash base, giving us the ability to shift to building a rental portfolio, which we did,” Tim said. “We have completed 55 deals since we started, and we currently have 13 cash flowing single family rentals in suburban neighborhoods with good school systems. Today, we are concentrating more on fix-and-flips until interest rates cool down but are looking forward to getting back to growing a substantial, long-term portfolio to provide lasting financial prosperity for our family.” The Swartz’s Crystal Ball When asked what 2024 has in store for their business, Tim and Melissa are quite optimistic. Columbus, Ohio, is a very competitive and very hot real estate market and it is the fastest growing metro area in the United States. The housing supply remains historically tight but is also very profitable. Tim elaborated by stating, “Interest rates will come down but not nearly as low as we’ve enjoyed in recent years. At least not any time soon. However, Columbus will do just fine and there will continue to be strong growth in prices.”  Melissa added that they are boosting their ad spend this year to bring in even more opportunities. She is especially optimistic because “we are all in now.” Tim left his job in June 2023, and they are both now 100% focused on the real estate business. Advice from an Expert “Our advice for anyone getting started in real estate investing is simple.” •             Always do what you say you are going to do and do it with integrity. •             Have confidence in yourself. •             Be humble. Homevestors What exactly does it mean to be a HomeVestors® business owner? Owning a real estate business is life changing and naturally comes with risks! When you become a HomeVestors business owner, you get immediate access to motivated seller leads, financing resources for qualifying purchases and repairs, one-on-one coaching with your local Development Agent, proprietary software for analyzing properties and deals, and access to a nationwide network of coaches and peers. Your house-buying business is yours and you run it as your own venture with a focus toward your individual business goals. If you are interested in a franchise, call 866-249-6932, email Sales@homevestorsfranchise.com or visit www.homevestorsfranchise.com. Each franchise office is independently owned and operated.

Read More

Invigorating America’s Housing Market

Some Proposals for Consideration By David Howard This year’s State of the Union address featured a number of proposals designed to invigorate America’s housing market. Most notable among the proposals: »              A two-year mortgage relief credit of up to $10,000 for first-time homebuyers »              A one-year tax credit of up to $10,000 for homeowners who sell a starter home to owner-occupants »              Up to $25,000 in downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers »              An expansion of the Housing Choice Voucher program for low-income renter households »              An expansion of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit enabling the construction of more units of affordable rental housing While the Administration deserves credit for its efforts to offer a real and constructive path forward to address the challenges facing America’s housing market, the political environment presents a high hurdle for any of the proposals to become law. Although the Administration is clearly attempting to strike a balance between the supply and demand sides of the housing equation, much of the emphasis is on the latter. So, in the interest of putting forth policy ideas that have the potential to drive housing development and investment, and in the process support SFR renters, owners, and builders, following are proposals for consideration: Allow the GSEs to Participate Fully in SFR Financing Activities Currently, Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are restricted by their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), from providing financing for owners of more than 10 one-to-four-unit investment properties. Placing an arbitrary restriction on who can and cannot access a preferred source of capital makes for bad policy. FHFA’s restriction only applies to SFR owners while allowing unfettered access to multifamily owners, regardless of size. Given the GSEs are charged with providing “liquidity, stability, and affordability” to the U.S. housing market it makes little economic — or intellectual — sense to exclude SFR owners merely because they are deemed to be “large.” At the very least, parity between the SFR and multifamily markets ensures the GSEs are better able to serve a broader, more diverse, universe of renter households and families.  Expand the Use of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to the SFR Market Currently, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), exists almost entirely to enable the production of multifamily units, even though single-family rental homes of between one and four units account for nearly 40% of the nation’s rental housing. LIHTC provisions are notoriously complex, especially so for owners and developers of single-family rental housing. Adapting LIHTC to the needs of the SFR market could be an effective way to expand the stock of much-needed affordable rental housing. Make Workforce Housing More Attainable by Supporting Build-to-Rent Development and Investment Build-to-Rent (BTR) single-family housing is ideally suited to meet the workforce housing and economic development needs of communities large and small. BTR housing is often designed to attract residents with a need for more space than can typically be found in a standard multifamily building. But because workforce housing by definition is not “affordable housing,” policy incentives to spur development and investment are more limited. Making tax credits available for BTR projects can serve a useful purpose in expanding the stock of quality, well-located, BTR single-family workforce housing. Incentivize SFR Owners and Developers to Embrace ‘Green Building’ Practices Residential energy use accounts for approximately 20% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. With nearly 20 million single-family rental homes throughout the country, the opportunity for environmental and energy policy is substantial. Expanding the use of targeted tax credits and other tools to encourage the participation of SFR owners can likely have an immediate and lasting benefit. Promote Homeownership through Lease-to-Own Programs Single-family rental housing can serve as an important step on the path to homeownership. Government policy can play an important role in facilitating the transition to homeownership by offering tax credits and other incentives to encourage formal lease-to-own agreements between residents and SFR owners.

Read More

Home Investor Share Inches Higher

Small Investors are Gradually Regaining Their Market Share By Thomas Malone The high U.S. home investor share seen over the past two years nudged up higher to close out 2023. In December, the share of single-family purchases that were made by investors hit 28.7%, an all-time high in CoreLogic’s data that dates to 2010. This was a clear rise over the Fall share and raises the possibility that the share could rise above 30% in early 2024. Figure 1 shows the share of home purchases made by investors since January 2019. In 2019 and 2020, the investor share never went above 20%, but in 2021 this share leaped up, and investors have made roughly a quarter of all single family purchases in each year since. Though the investor surge began in the low interest rate environment, it has persisted throughout all interest rate increases, and is not showing anything that would indicate it will return drop back below 20% soon.   Figure 2 illustrates the number of U.S. home purchases made by investors and non-investors through December 2023. All these numbers are well below the levels investors purchased at in the previous 2 years, where investors made more than 100,000 purchases in each month. Notable in Figure 2 is the large drop in owner-occupied purchases, down about 200,000 purchases a month from the levels seen from 2020 to 2022. This is our earliest snapshot of how different types of buyers might react to rates above 7% and shows an early sign that investors may be the more resilient group. Small investors make up most of the market Figure 3 shows that throughout 2023, mega-investors (those that own 1,000 or more properties) and large investors (those that own 100 to 999 properties) have each held market shares of about 10%. Medium investors (those that own 10 to 99 properties) made up about 35% of the market, and small investors (those that own 3 to 9 properties) were the remaining 45%. Though we are seeing an uptick in investor share, this is masking what is really a cold market. Flippers are buying at rates that are well below their pre-pandemic levels, and large/mega-investors have stopped their spending sprees. Small investors are gradually regaining their market share, but still are only buying at their pre-pandemic levels. Interestingly, it may be the low rates of 2020-22 might be bringing new ‘Mom and Pop’ investors into the market. The low rates of this period let a huge number of existing homeowners refinance their mortgage to more favorable terms, raising the chances that they rent out their existing home when they move, rather than sell. This is happening while rising rates and prices push potential first time buyers who cannot make a down payment back to the rental market.

Read More