Q & A

Warren Ifergane, CEO, ICG10 Capital, LLC

A Conversation About the Economy, Lending and the Real Estate Industry Warren Ifergane is the CEO of ICG10 Capital LLC, a private lending company focusing on financing for fix-and-flips, new construction, and long-term rental properties. Currently lending in 44 states, they are very active in secondary cities such as Jacksonville, FL, Kansas City, MO, and Atlanta, GA. With headquarters in Miami, FL, ICG10 funded $250MM in loans in 2022. REI INK sat down with Ifergane to get his thoughts on the current state of the economy and the real estate investment industry, in general. Warren, to start with, how about a little background. You were born in Paris, France and moved to the United States when you were seven years old and settled in Miami. Can you give a quick overview of your professional journey? Eleven years ago, I started as a part-time teller at Bank of America making around $800 per month. I was renting this studio apartment for $600/month after being kicked out from my “father’s” house for no other reason than his wife didn’t like me. I had no money and not even enough income to change the bedsheets that came with the place. The room had no windows and no light and was basically a direct reflection of my life at that point in time. And it was not a safe environment. After several jobs, I eventually landed a position as a private equity analyst. During that time, I also earned my MBA at Indiana University. Within five years, I was the Executive Director at that hedge fund company managing over $1B in distressed loans and making portfolio management decisions. After that, I started my own lending company, ICG10, and worked 12-16 hours every day to build the business to where it is today. A question on everybody’s mind is the state of the economy. We have inflation, rising interest rates, a proxy war in Europe, a tremendous national debt and most recently a few bank collapses. What is your take on the economy and how it may impact the real estate investment industry? Regarding real estate, it is a challenging time for anyone who is involved in real estate on a volume basis, specifically lenders, title companies, realtors, home inspectors, appraisers, etc. But with any challenge, there is the opportunity to get some substantial discounts on properties that have been sitting on the market. Very importantly, there is a slow-down in transactions as a consequence of supply and demand. Obviously, the Fed raising rates makes it particularly difficult for borrowers to purchase at affordable levels, especially since home prices have not adjusted that much relative to interest rates. But what many people don’t talk about are the ramifications of having near-zero interest rates the last few years. Approximately 85% of home owners have mortgages below 6% which evidently cripples refinances, but it also does not provide any incentives for current homeowners to list their homes. This basically shut down the “move up” buyers because they would face higher interest rates and higher purchase prices at the same time, which usually isn’t worth it when they are comparing a new home to what they currently own. In terms of finance and lending, lower transactions are affecting everyone in the space. With that said, banks have been curtailing back even further than the private lending space. So far, the private lending space has been resilient and is really functioning pretty well at fulfilling its major function, which is providing liquidity to “unbankable” or “bankable” but “hurried” customers looking for high leverage. And the recent bank collapses? It’s clear our financial system is not designed to withstand the pace of rate hikes we have seen thus far from the Fed. If you’re looking for the immediate reason of the SVB failure, it’s simply because cost of capital and risk-profiles have changed due to these rate increases, crushing valuations on young startups and even treasuries. A deal that seemed to make sense given a certain amount of risk a year ago does not make sense now. The Fed’s blunt tool is just that, extremely blunt. And SVB made the cardinal sin of mismatching durations (taking short term deposits from customers and investing them at less than 2% on 10-year treasuries. Right now, we’re not sure of the extent, but I suspect the Fed broke something and a pivot will be in play shortly. This may present buying opportunities if things don’t get too much worse. But the Fed still needs to cut rates to avoid a contagion. I personally wouldn’t keep my money in any regional bank as the risk is too high to earn cheap saving returns. If you’re going to keep cash, diversify it in some of the major banks that still pay yields. But all in all, I think this situation may end up being a good thing for real estate down the road. Your company had an excellent 2022 with $250MM in loans. What are your current thoughts on various strategies, fix-and flip vs buy-and-hold vs short-term rentals? Everyone has different strategies and personalities. Each one of them can make you massive amounts of money if scaled correctly. So that’s where we try to come in. I had one borrower who had never done a loan in his life. He met me and I convinced him the best course of action was for him to leverage and scale. Within a couple years, he acquired over 40 rental properties and increased his net worth by 2-3 million dollars, each of them cash flowing very well. That’s what I aim to do: provide access to capital so others can be successful. At the same time, I have clients that do Airbnb and are crushing it. Most investors buy properties that need renovation, and they fix them up specifically to target the Airbnb clientele. And I’ve also seen “pure” flippers that make even more money. We have one client who did over 50 flips with us in

Read More

Q&A with ILE Homes’ Mahesh Shetty and Dan Brady

A Conversation About SFR, Multifamily, and Institutional Buyers Mahesh Shetty is the CEO of ILE Homes, a privately held single-family rental and asset management company. ILE generates current income and capital appreciation through investments in single-family rental homes and mitigates risk through diversification across the best residential rental markets so investors can build wealth with little active management. Dan Brady is the Vice President of Acquisitions for ILE Homes. Dan has been involved in over 1,750 scattered site single family acquisitions and professionally renovated over 450 homes since 2011. REI INK sat down with Mahesh and Dan to get their thoughts on the single-family rental market, multifamily investments and how, if at all, institutional buyers changed the real estate investment landscape. Mahesh, given your finance background, do you see the economics and operational aspects of SFR and Multifamily converging even more than has taken place over the past five years? MS // At a macro level, it appears that there is a lot in common. And there is significant overlap in multifamily and BTR single family segment. But the similarity stops there. The art of acquiring scattered sites, renovating, and managing them requires a skill set that is completely different from managing apartments. The advantages of design and density that is common in multifamily is absent in scattered site rentals — one size does not fit all in single-family rentals. There is a bespoke nature to single family rentals that requires seasoning and acculturation in the team to be truly successful. Mahesh, you have an extensive background in almost every facet of real estate, except Single Family Rentals. Most people gravitate toward, some would say graduate to, Multifamily from SFR, but you are doing just the opposite – why? MS // With my background in private equity and mergers and acquisitions, I was excited about the opportunities of creating value in a fragmented sector. Every other sector of commercial real estate is “institutionalized”— single family rentals are on the verge of massive consolidation in the next ten years. I wanted to play a small role in the process and be on the proverbial cutting edge of this industry consolidation. Dan, there has been a lot of recent press around institutional buyers — mostly bad. Has this press tarnished the SFR space? DB // In no way has the press tarnished single family rentals; however, they have tried to paintus as the “bad guys.” I would say that institutional buyers are IMPROVING the normal rental experience for our tenants.  Institutions renovate with two major thoughts in mind — safety and security — neither are ever compromised. Institutions typically have more available cash to renovate properly on the front side, and also spend when necessary for major repair and maintenance issues. The typical tenant experience in an institutional home, is normally superior to the average Mom and Pop owner that may be cash strapped when repairs are needed. Dan, to expand on that, as institutional buyers continue to grab market share, do you see them pushing the smaller operators out of the space, which would actually mirror what happened in the multifamily space? DB // We are a LONG way from institutional ownership dominating the SFR space unlike the ownership patterns in other sectors of commercial real estate. For example, in multifamily the institutional presence exceeds 55%. If institutional ownership in the SFR space reaches 15% in the next 15 years, I would be surprised.  There will always be a space for both smaller operators and institutions. Mahesh, what are your thoughts? Are institutional buyers really keeping first time homebuyers from entering the market? MS // First time home buyers are typically more competitive than institutional buyers because their time horizon on ownership is longer, they are looking to provide a shelter for their family, and there is a tremendous amount of pride and emotion wrapped into the purchase. As a result, they are willing to pay market or a premium for the home. On the other hand, the institutional investor is numerically focused on returns over a 5–10-year horizon and is less likely to pay a premium for the property. Typically, they buy homes that are in some form of distress and require a level of renovation that first time home buyers do not have the knowledge or the patience to attempt. The flipper market has always existed in the US — their exit was the mom & pop rental owner. The institutional investor has consolidated the flipping business without impinging on the first-time home buyer market. Mahesh, what steps did you take to prepare the company to both solicit institutional capital, and how large would I need to be before seeking institutional capital? MS // We started with the proverbial three-legged stool — an experienced team, developed and refined our processes, overlaid it with proprietary technology. Once we had those three elements in place, we bought properties to demonstrate our ability to synthesize the components and make the whole (our company) better than the sum of the parts (people, technology and processes). Institutions are keen on investing in management teams and platforms that can absorb capital and scale and providing institutional level reporting and transparency on the performance.  Dan, with the market downturn, do you foresee institutional capital staying on the sideline? DB // This is a great question! I would say that “some” institutional capital may run, but the majority will remain committed to the space. SFRs are the safest harbor in an inflationary environment. The ability to dollar cost average as one buys scattered site homes is core to portfolio valuation protection. While one asset may take a dip, another certainly will offset the decline, and often out pace. We are long-term players, as is our capital. Long-term, SFR is the absolute best hedge in real estate. Mahesh, what is your vision for ILE Homes and how long will it take you to get there? MS // We have always dreamed BIG. Our vision for the company

Read More